Prediction of Jim Gurfein vs Marcelo Hennemann Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Gurfein vs M. Hennemann

Jim Gurfein

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

149

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Marcelo Hennemann

BRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

149

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Gurfein 1 - 0 Hennemann

They have played 2 sets in total, with Jim Gurfein winning 2 and Marcelo Hennemann winning 0. The last match between Jim Gurfein and Marcelo Hennemann was at the Rio De Janeiro CH, 02-12-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Jim Gurfein getting the victory 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Gurfein	1
Hennemann	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Rio De Janeiro CH(12-02-85)

Stats

Jim Gurfein

Marcelo Hennemann

J. Gurfein vs M. Hennemann H2H Profile

J. Gurfein	Stats	M. Hennemann
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.55% (94-117)	Career Total W/L	41.82% (46-64)
1	Clay	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Gurfein vs M. Hennemann Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jim Gurfein has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marcelo Hennemann has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jim Gurfein, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marcelo Hennemann has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Jim Gurfein has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marcelo Hennemann has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Jim Gurfein has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marcelo Hennemann winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Jim Gurfein has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 57/58), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 27/43). Marcelo Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 41/51), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 4/12).
Player level: In the last year, Jim Gurfein has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marcelo Hennemann has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jim Gurfein winning 1 times and Marcelo Hennemann being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jim Gurfein winning 2 and Marcelo Hennemann winning 0.
The last match between Jim Gurfein and Marcelo Hennemann was at the Rio De Janeiro CH, 02-12-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Jim Gurfein getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jim Gurfein has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marcelo Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jim Gurfein has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marcelo Hennemann has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Jim Gurfein has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marcelo Hennemann has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Jim Gurfein vs Marcelo Hennemann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Gurfein vs M. Hennemann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Gurfein	Stats	M. Hennemann
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Gurfein Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Brasilia CH - 14-11-1988
R3 Ivan KleyI. Kley	L	1-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
Buenos Aires - 07-11-1988
R3 Gustavo GiussaniG. Giussani	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
Sao Paulo - 31-10-1988
R3 Cassio MottaC. Motta	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Las Vegas CH - 10-10-1988
R3 Marcel FreemanM. Freeman	W	7-6 7-5	Stats
QF Vijay AmritrajV. Amritraj	L	6-4 4-6 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Hennemann Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Brasilia CH - 14-08-1989
R2 David MacphersonD. Macpherson	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
Sao Paulo CH - 07-08-1989
R3 Stefan DallwitzS. Dallwitz	L	6-2 4-6 6-2	Stats
Neu Ulm CH - 03-07-1989
R3 Frank DennhardtF. Dennhardt	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Hossegor CH - 19-06-1989
R4 Bruno OresarB. Oresar	L	5-7 6-4 6-2	Stats
R3 Rodolphe GilbertR. Gilbert	W	4-6 6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

J. Gurfein vs M. Hennemann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Gurfein	Stats	M. Hennemann
44.55% (94/117)	YTD Win/Loss	41.82% (46/64)
46.11% (237/277)	Sets Win/Loss	44.36% (114/143)
48.77% (2353/2472)	Games Win/Loss	46.94% (1104/1248)
38.57% (27/43)	Hard Win/Loss	25.00% (4/12)
49.57% (57/58)	Clay Win/Loss	44.57% (41/51)
35.71% (5/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
41.67% (5/7)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
527.46	Average Opponent Rank	369.84
25.00% (3/9)	Slam W/L	50.00% (1/1)
50.00% (4/4)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
38.55% (32/51)	Main Tour W/L	35.71% (5/9)
50.93% (55/53)	Challenger W/L	42.55% (40/54)
45% (87/192)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	41% (43/106)
31% (5/16)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (1/2)
46% (33/72)	Deciding Set Win %	32% (12/37)
75% (103/77)	1st Set Won, Won Match	69% (55/38)
25% (103/26)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	31% (55/17)
16% (107/17)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	11% (54/6)